| LEADER 00000nam 2200361 i 4500 |
| 001 13399119991 |
| 003 ULIBM |
| 008 111126s2011 us a 001 0 eng d |
| 020 ^a9781605472119
|
| 020 ^a1605472115
|
| 041 0 ^aeng
|
| 050 4 ^aWY86^bM45T^cc2011
|
| 060 4 ^aWY86^bM45T^cc2011
|
| 100 1 ^aMeleis, Afaf Ibrahim,^eauthor.
|
| 245 10 ^aTheoretical nursing :^bdevelopment and progress /^cAfafIbrahim Meleis, PhD, FAAN, Margaret Bond Simon Dean,Professor of Nursing and Sociology, University ofPennsylvania, School of Nursing, Philadelphia,Pennsylvania.
|
| 250 ^a5th ed.
|
| 260 ^aPhiladelphia :^bWolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams& Wilkins,^cc2011
|
| 300 ^axiii, 672 pages :^billustrations ;^c26 cm
|
| 504 ^aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 502-635) andindexes.
|
| 520 ^a^"An additional assumption was that the processes fortheory development were new to nursing and hence, nursesin graduate programs learned strategies for advancingknowledge from other disciplines. This assumption wasdebunked with the knowledge that nurses were alwaysengaged in knowledge development, driven by theirexperiences in clinical practice. Because of theseassumptions, most of the early writing about theorydevelopment was about outlining strategies that should beused, rather than strategies that have already been usedin the discipline to develop theories. Theoriststhemselves did not uncover or adequately discuss ways bywhich they developed their theories, therefore thetendency was to describe processes that were based ontheories developed in other disciplines, mainly thephysical and social sciences. And an implicit assumptionwas made that there should be a single strategy for theorydevelopment, some claiming to begin the process frompractice, and others believing it should be driven byresearch^"--Provided by publisher.
|
| 650 0 ^aNursing^xPhilosophy.
|
| 650 12 ^aNursing Theory.
|
| 945 ^p0^l0^i36529
|
| 945 ^p0^l0^i36530 |
| 999 ^aลิขิตลักษณ์
|